Saturday, January 16, 2021
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • About Us
  • Contact
Home
  • Home
  • Business
  • Celebrity
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Politics
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • World
No Result
View All Result
Home
  • Home
  • Business
  • Celebrity
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Politics
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • Travel
  • World
No Result
View All Result
Home
No Result
View All Result
Home Technology

Banks aren’t as stupid as enterprise AI and fintech entrepreneurs think

Darren by Darren
August 29, 2020
in Technology
405 17
0
Banks aren’t as stupid as enterprise AI and fintech entrepreneurs think
585
SHARES
3.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Simon Moss
Contributor

You might also like

After Prop 22’s passage, Uber is taking its lobbying effort global

Elon Musk’s Tesla tequila will run you $250 a bottle

Steve Bannon’s show pulled off Twitter and YouTube over calls for violence

Share on Twitter

Simon Moss is CEO of Symphony AyasdiAI, an enterprise artificial intelligence company for financial services.

Announcements like Selina Finance’s $53 million raise and another $64.7 million raise the next day for a different banking startup spark enterprise artificial intelligence and fintech evangelists to rejoin the debate over how banks are stupid and need help or competition.
The complaint is banks are seemingly too slow to adopt fintech’s bright ideas. They don’t seem to grasp where the industry is headed. Some technologists, tired of marketing their wares to banks, have instead decided to go ahead and launch their own challenger banks.
But old-school financiers aren’t dumb. Most know the “buy versus build” choice in fintech is a false choice. The right question is almost never whether to buy software or build it internally. Instead, banks have often worked to walk the difficult but smarter path right down the middle — and that’s accelerating.
Two reasons why banks are smarter
That’s not to say banks haven’t made horrendous mistakes. Critics complain about banks spending billions trying to be software companies, creating huge IT businesses with huge redundancies in cost and longevity challenges, and investing into ineffectual innovation and “intrapreneurial” endeavors. But overall, banks know their business way better than the entrepreneurial markets that seek to influence them.
First, banks have something most technologists don’t have enough of: Banks have domain expertise. Technologists tend to discount the exchange value of domain knowledge. And that’s a mistake. So much abstract technology, without critical discussion, deep product management alignment and crisp, clear and business-usefulness, makes too much technology abstract from the material value it seeks to create.
Second, banks are not reluctant to buy because they don’t value enterprise artificial intelligence and other fintech. They’re reluctant because they value it too much. They know enterprise AI gives a competitive edge, so why should they get it from the same platform everyone else is attached to, drawing from the same data lake?
Competitiveness, differentiation, alpha, risk transparency and operational productivity will be defined by how highly productive, high-performance cognitive tools are deployed at scale in the incredibly near future. The combination of NLP, ML, AI and cloud will accelerate competitive ideation in order of magnitude. The question is, how do you own the key elements of competitiveness? It’s a tough question for many enterprises to answer.
If they get it right, banks can obtain the true value of their domain expertise and develop a differentiated edge where they don’t just float along with every other bank on someone’s platform. They can define the future of their industry and keep the value. AI is a force multiplier for business knowledge and creativity. If you don’t know your business well, you’re wasting your money. Same goes for the entrepreneur. If you can’t make your portfolio absolutely business relevant, you end up being a consulting business pretending to be a product innovator.
Who’s afraid of who?
So are banks at best cautious, and at worst afraid? They don’t want to invest in the next big thing only to have it flop. They can’t distinguish what’s real from hype in the fintech space. And that’s understandable. After all, they have spent a fortune on AI. Or have they?
It seems they have spent a fortune on stuff called AI — internal projects with not a snowball’s chance in hell to scale to the volume and concurrency demands of the firm. Or they have become enmeshed in huge consulting projects staggering toward some lofty objective that everyone knows deep down is not possible.
This perceived trepidation may or may not be good for banking, but it certainly has helped foster the new industry of the challenger bank.
Challenger banks are widely accepted to have come around because traditional banks are too stuck in the past to adopt their new ideas. Investors too easily agree. In recent weeks, American challenger banks Chime unveiled a credit card, U.S.-based Point launched and German challenger bank Vivid launched with the help of Solarisbank, a fintech company.
What’s going on behind the curtain
Traditional banks are spending resources on hiring data scientists too — sometimes in numbers that dwarf the challenger bankers. Legacy bankers want to listen to their data scientists on questions and challenges rather than pay more for an external fintech vendor to answer or solve them.
This arguably is the smart play. Traditional bankers are asking themselves why should they pay for fintech services that they can’t 100% own, or how can they buy the right bits, and retain the parts that amount to a competitive edge? They don’t want that competitive edge floating around in a data lake somewhere.
From banks’ perspective, it’s better to “fintech” internally or else there’s no competitive advantage; the business case is always compelling. The problem is a bank is not designed to stimulate creativity in design. JPMC’s COIN project is a rare and fantastically successful project. Though, this is an example of a super alignment between creative fintech and the bank being able to articulate a clear, crisp business problem — a Product Requirements Document for want of a better term. Most internal development is playing games with open source, with the shine of the alchemy wearing off as budgets are looked at hard in respect to return on investment.
A lot of people are going to talk about setting new standards in the coming years as banks onboard these services and buy new companies. Ultimately, fintech firms and banks are going to join together and make the new standard as new options in banking proliferate.
Don’t incur too much technical debt
So, there’s a danger to spending too much time learning how to do it yourself and missing the boat as everyone else moves ahead.
Engineers will tell you that untutored management can fail to steer a consistent course. The result is an accumulation of technical debt as development-level requirements keep zigzagging. Laying too much pressure on your data scientists and engineers can also lead to technical debt piling up faster. A bug or an inefficiency is left in place. New features are built as workarounds.
This is one reason why in-house-built software has a reputation for not scaling. The same problem shows up in consultant-developed software. Old problems in the system hide underneath new ones and the cracks begin to show in the new applications built on top of low-quality code.
So how to fix this? What’s the right model?
It’s a bit of a dull answer, but success comes from humility. It needs an understanding that big problems are solved with creative teams, each understanding what they bring, each being respected as equals and managed in a completely clear articulation on what needs to be solved and what success looks like.
Throw in some Stalinist project management and your probability of success goes up an order of magnitude. So, the successes of the future will see banks having fewer but way more trusted fintech partners that jointly value the intellectual property they are creating. They’ll have to respect that neither can succeed without the other. It’s a tough code to crack. But without it, banks are in trouble, and so are the entrepreneurs that seek to work with them.


Darren

Darren

I'm a professional writer and a part time Blogger

Related Posts

Gig worker ballot measure Prop 22 is projected to pass, according to the AP
Technology

After Prop 22’s passage, Uber is taking its lobbying effort global

by Darren
November 6, 2020
Elon Musk’s Tesla tequila will run you $250 a bottle
Technology

Elon Musk’s Tesla tequila will run you $250 a bottle

by Darren
November 6, 2020
Steve Bannon’s show pulled off Twitter and YouTube over calls for violence
Technology

Steve Bannon’s show pulled off Twitter and YouTube over calls for violence

by Darren
November 6, 2020
SpaceX successfully launches GPS III space vehicle for the U.S. Space Force
Technology

SpaceX successfully launches GPS III space vehicle for the U.S. Space Force

by Darren
November 5, 2020
Why Florida residents may soon be seeing jet-powered ‘flying taxis’
Technology

Why Florida residents may soon be seeing jet-powered ‘flying taxis’

by Darren
November 5, 2020

Recommended

Will the UN stop UNWTO Secretary-General Pololikashvili?

Will the UN stop UNWTO Secretary-General Pololikashvili?

September 21, 2020
What’s On Tonight: Rob Schneider’s First Netflix Stand-Up Special Features A Duet With Elle King

What’s On Tonight: Rob Schneider’s First Netflix Stand-Up Special Features A Duet With Elle King

August 11, 2020

Categories

  • Business
  • Celebrity
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Fashion
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Sport
  • Technology
  • Travel

Don't miss it

Yes, Billie Eilish's Futuristic Boots Are Out of This World
Fashion

Yes, Billie Eilish's Futuristic Boots Are Out of This World

January 16, 2021
"You Are Never Alone": Kamala Harris Honors Her Divine Nine Sorority AKA in Heartfelt Post
Celebrity

"You Are Never Alone": Kamala Harris Honors Her Divine Nine Sorority AKA in Heartfelt Post

January 16, 2021
That's My Best Friend: Saweetie's Pink Tie-Dye Sweatsuit Can Be Yours For $154
Fashion

That's My Best Friend: Saweetie's Pink Tie-Dye Sweatsuit Can Be Yours For $154

January 16, 2021
The 20 Most Cute and Comfortable Flats You'll Never Tire of Wearing
Fashion

The 20 Most Cute and Comfortable Flats You'll Never Tire of Wearing

January 15, 2021
Anthony Mackie Says Paul Rudd Throws Shade by Talking "Intellectual Trash," and We Believe It
Celebrity

Anthony Mackie Says Paul Rudd Throws Shade by Talking "Intellectual Trash," and We Believe It

January 15, 2021
19 Practical and Stylish Sneakers You'll Want to Brag About
Fashion

19 Practical and Stylish Sneakers You'll Want to Brag About

January 15, 2021
Home

We bring you the best News, Lifestyle,

No Result
View All Result
  • World
  • Lifestyle
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Sports

© 2020 The Sooper Mag

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Fill the forms bellow to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In